Wen | Zero One

After entering March, the first new films are argyle: Secret Agent and Mrs Spider: Super Sensual Awakening. These two "cannon fodder-like" imported films have collapsed at the box office in overseas markets, and today’s China film market is not very enthusiastic about imported films. Sure enough, the two films are silent, and Mrs Spider: Super Sensory Awakening has been released for four days and even less than 5 million box office.

The crime action film "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" released on the same day as "Mrs Spider: Super Feeling Awakening" successfully overwhelmed the Spring Festival heroes and became the first new Japanese crown film after the holiday, with a box office of over 180 million in five days. The professional edition of Lighthouse shows that the pre-screening media forecast of "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" was between 80 million and 200 million, and now the total box office predicted by AI has exceeded 400 million, and the results far exceed expectations.

Not only that, "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" also succeeded in the popularity of online platforms, which triggered the spread of topics from multiple angles on social platforms. The turbulent public opinion about "Eliminating Three Harms in the Week" is very complicated, from the scale, performance, story, cult to the off-site plagiarism, which is very different from the spread of the Spring Festival movies with their own distinctive selling points.

However, starting from the film itself, the first impression of "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" to many audiences is relatively unified: a crime film that "fights violence with violence". At the same time, the background color of gangster movies from Hong Kong and Taiwan, coupled with the fable of "eliminating three evils around" and the metaphor of the cult massacre bridge, provides a rare cult temperament and bloody scene for mainland audiences. Generally speaking, it is a movie with cool films and curiosity as its core selling points.

The propaganda introduces that the allusion of "eliminating three evils in Zhou" quoted in the film can be found in The Book of Jin Zhou Chu Zhuan and Shi Shuo Xin Yu. According to records, the young man was burly and powerful, but he ran wild in the village and was hated by his neighbors. After Zhou Chu killed the tiger Nie Jiao alone, he himself turned back and reformed, so far all three evils have been eliminated.

The most wanted criminal Chen Guilin (Ehan Juan) is dying, only to find that he is only ranked third on the most wanted list. He is determined to find out the whereabouts of the first two most wanted criminals and get rid of them one by one. Chen Guilin thought that he had become a contemporary Zhou Chu in addition to the three evils, but he did not expect that greed and ignorance, which he could never understand, was the crime and punishment that life would eventually face.

The most wonderful thing about the story of the movie "Eliminating Three Harms Around" is that it provides too many allegorical plots, which brings great interpretable space. This is a rare movie-watching experience in domestic cinemas in recent years. This is not only a type crime movie that makes you "cool", but also provides enough metaphors for you to remember, so that you can find enough in the social memes spread by famous scenes and the interpretation of Douban long film reviews.

This versatility may be the internal main reason why "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" can exceed the box office expectation. In terms of scale or curiosity, in fact, quite a few Hong Kong and Taiwan cast films have made many attempts in the past two years, but the so-called scale often stays in the action and form and the ferocity of the crime film style itself, while "Eliminating Three Harms Around" conveys a certain sense of absurdity through metaphor and counter-routine, and then constitutes a contemporary fable that every audience can have a aftertaste, which is an important reason why the film temperament can "shock" many audiences.

The first interpretation space of the film story is obvious. (There are spoilers below) The three poisons "greed and ignorance" in Buddhism appear in the film with the intention of pigeon, snake and pig respectively, especially referring to Lin Luhe, Aberdeen and Chen Guilin, who rank the top three in the most wanted list in the film. The first two are easy to understand. Pigeons are regarded as representatives of greed because of excessive eating, while the venerable Lin Lu and others are advised to put everything down but they are searching for everything in the dark. Aberdeen was so jealous that he beat his men violently and threatened Chen Guilin when he visited the hair salon. His hatred was very direct.

And "chi" is relatively obscure. In Buddhism, "chi" is also translated as "ignorance", which means ignorance and ignorance. To put it simply, I am confused. I don’t know what good and evil are, what greed is, what cause and effect are, and I don’t understand right and wrong, so I act upside down. Chen Guilin’s life track is just like this-when he was a young gangster, he shot the leader with his head fever to make a name for himself. With his youth and luck, he escaped the police attack. When he was in his thirties and forties, he was confused by the doctor and had to turn himself in after praying to God. However, he became famous by imitating the idea of "eliminating three evils around" because he was behind in the rankings. As a result, he was once again confused by the venerable man, thinking that he could make amends and become a new person.

Chen Guilin is not a born villain, but more like a junior high school student who always stays in the stage of "chopping people with a knife without knowing the consequences", and is a person who "stays in his original idea". The process of "eliminating the three evils" is also the process of Chen Guilin’s "awakening" after "breaking his delusion". Therefore, the cult plot focusing on breaking the "delusion" will become the climax of the whole film, and Chen Guilin will just return after killing the venerable one and hearing the singing again.

On the other hand, just like Chen Guilin in the past, he casually became a criminal who harmed one side for his imaginary name. Chen Guilin once believed in his imaginary fame story so much, and believed in the theoretical disguise of the venerable when he thought his life was near. Perhaps he finally realized that the harm of "delusion" was hidden, but it was often the root of everything. Only people could begin to objectively ask about the nature of "belief" in themselves. It was not until the last moment of his life that perhaps Chen Guilin finally understood what he wanted to be "famous around".

Therefore, although this scene is not a profound depiction of cults, it is definitely a scene that can leave traces in China’s film history.

On the other hand, "Eliminating Three Harms in Zhou Chu" tells an ironic story of a marginal person who wants to enter the mainstream in vain. Obviously, Chen Guilin came from a defective and broken family, and was raised by his ancestors. All his capital was just himself, but he was born with the idea of making a name for himself. Therefore, he first became a wanted man by extreme means, and then he was lost in the collective atmosphere created by cults. But from beginning to end, he never really entered the mainstream of society.

In the past, many Taiwan Province film classics were famous for their multiple interpretations of "youth". In addition to those youth love movies, those movies with a sharper appearance are actually explaining the core of youth. In monga, also starring Ehan Juan, this kind of youth is hidden in the arrogance and extravagance under shouting and killing. In brighter summer day, a classic by Yang Dechang, youth may be Hani’s tall, fearless and fragile short life, and it is also the end of the inner world of Grade Four from purity to chaos.

So from another point of view, Chen Guilin, played by Ehan Juan, is also a "teenager" role in "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks". Although he is not a teenager in the film, his "infatuation" from beginning to end is not only the ignorance and confusion mentioned above, but also the straightforward wildness unique to teenagers-he is fierce and dangerous with his minions exposed, but also vulnerable and defenseless inside. Ehan Juan is absolutely a match made in heaven for this role. You can’t think of anyone who can replace the "innocence" in his eyes.

In addition, there are quite a few film defects in "Eliminating Three Harms in Zhou Chu". The incompetence of the police role and the appearance of it, Chen Guilin was stabbed and buried alive in the coffin, but he just broke through the ground. Many plots were quite rough and unreasonable. However, the presentation of female characters and the complexity of the plot after the arrest have more or less hindered the upper limit of this film.

"Eliminating Three Harms in the Week" provides enough angles for social networks to talk about, and its communication logic is extremely prominent in favor of interpretation and discussion, rather than the common marketing communication mode in the past year. For example, on the popularity of the platform, "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" is actually not prominent on the vibrato platform where film and television are widely publicized. The cumulative number of topics played is nearly 1.2 billion, which is only similar to the recently popular online movie Anacondas’s "Arrogant 2", which is far from the data of the Spring Festival.

However, according to the data on platforms such as Weibo, Zhihu and Douban, the popularity of "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" basically far exceeds that of all other films:

Judging from the scores of Weibo searchers counted by Dengta Data, it has been the first since the second day of the release;

On the hot list of Zhihu, until March 6th, there were still two topics named "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" ranked third and fourth. There are tens of millions of questions about "How to evaluate" Three Harms in Weeks ",which even exceeds the discussion volume of all Spring Festival explosions in Zhihu, including YOLO’s Article 20 and Pegasus 2.

On Douban, more than 420,000 people have watched "Eliminating Three Harms at Weeks", which is basically equivalent to "Article 20" and "Pegasus 2", and the box office receipts of the last two films are more than ten times that of "Eliminating Three Harms at Weeks".

Therefore, the communication route of "Eliminating Three Harms in Zhou Chu" has largely returned to the discussion of the film content itself. Of course, many second-generation contents and more network memes about cult scenes have also played a role, but that is not the core driving force for the continuous destruction of "Eliminating Three Harms in Zhou Chu".

However, in the process of breaking the circle and spreading the topic of "Eliminating Three Harms around", there are indeed several enlarged nodes that have little to do with the movie plot itself, which are worth recording:

The first is the discussion of "scale". The change of the disk of "Eliminating Three Harms in Zhou Chu" has once again triggered the discussion about deletion. The topic is not new, but it has not been discussed for a long time.

The second is the "famous scene". The visual impact of Chen Guilin’s shooting of cultists is extremely strong, which leads to the crazy spread of relevant screenshots on the Internet, and promotes the spread of a large number of second-generation content of Chen Guilin, Venerable, Guitar and cult brainwashing theme songs;

The third is "plagiarism". Joe Chien, director of Taiwan Province, issued a document pointing out that "Eliminating Three Harms in Weeks" plagiarized his own script "lawless", from the core idea of the story to the name and plot, of course, both sides are arguing for their own words. The rave reviews of the content and plagiarism have become more popular together, with nearly 100,000 praises from Weibo in Joe Chien.

Therefore, combining the content and communication situation, we may be able to better understand why this film can arouse a lot of discussions from different angles in today’s Jane-Chinese Internet, given that the publicity budget is flat. A real classic of film history may not be a hit, but most of the films that can make a hit today must have "points", at least let the public have enough space for discussion and interpretation, and enough motivation to participate in communication.

* Original article, please indicate the source when reprinting.

　　From April 13th to 15th, Chen Yichao’s bribery case was heard in the People’s Court of Ganzhou District, Zhangye City, Gansu Province. China Youth Daily Zhongqing Online Reporter Lu Yijie/photo

　　On November 25, 2011, Fan Xiuling (left) and Chen Yichao (right) gave the personal account named "Jia Yuan" a voucher for transfer. Fan Xiuling/Photo courtesy

　　Chen Yichao, 57, has gray hair. He hunched slightly and limped into the court, expressionless.

　　At one time, the gold merchant’s biggest handwriting was to earn 100 million yuan in one fell swoop; However, after the procuratorate found that he paid a bribe of 300,000 yuan for a car, he lost his freedom. Although there is no trial or conviction, as early as more than four years ago, Chen Yichao’s property of at least 10 million yuan has nothing to do with him — — Some commission for discipline inspection, discipline inspection cadres and prosecutors have become the masters of these wealth.

　　Among these properties, three cars were transferred to the General Office of the CPC Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, and two cars were changed to the name of the staff of the People’s Procuratorate of Ganzhou District, Zhangye City, Gansu Province. In addition, at least 9.52 million yuan of funds were transferred to the personal accounts of the discipline inspection cadres in Gansu Province and the prosecutors handling cases in the People’s Procuratorate of Ganzhou District, and one of the transfers was handled by the wife of the discipline inspection cadres working in the bank.

　　The interviewed scholars told China Youth Daily and Zhongqing Online reporter that in the process of criminal proceedings, any institution can only temporarily detain the property before the court decides, and cannot transfer the ownership. If the property is transferred to an individual’s name, "it is a violation of discipline and a new corruption."

　　"In this case, I think it is not a big deal to be suspected of bribery. The big thing is these properties!" At the trial site of Ganzhou District People’s Court on April 13, Chen Yichao, who pleaded not guilty, said that he would report the case handlers.

　　Gold miners were questioned by prosecutors at the provincial commission for discipline inspection.

　　Chen Yichao is from Tianshui, Gansu. Earlier, he worked in Tianshui Station of Gansu Provincial Material Administration Bureau for 17 years. There was a special railway line for transporting ore in the station, and he contacted a group of people who "mined". In the mid-1990s, when the Property Management Bureau was restructured, Chen Yichao decided to find his own way out and do "mining" business.

　　The gold mine brought wealth to Chen Yichao, which also made his fate turn sharply. In late May 2011, he was taken away by the case handlers in Lanzhou, and then the case handlers found his wife Fan Xiuling from the hotel.

　　Fan Xiuling used to be an employee of a bank in Tianshui. She recalled that she was asked about the relationship between Chen Yichao and citic guoan Gold Company, and what property she had at home, such as real estate, vehicles and deposits in bank cards.

　　Citic guoan Gold Company is a wholly state-owned subsidiary of CITIC Guoan Group, which is well-known in the domestic gold industry. In May 2000, Chen Yichao, who wanted to develop Toutanzi Gold Mine in Huixian County, Gansu Province, reached a cooperation intention with the gold company in the name of a company.

　　In the next three years, the Gold Company won the exploration right and decided to set up a new joint-stock company in cooperation with another state-owned enterprise in Huixian County. The Gold Company invested in mining rights and held 37% of the shares.

　　Due to the restructuring and other reasons, the gold company actually withdrew from business. In June 2006, Chen Yichao agreed to transfer 37% of his shares in the name of Gold Company, which made him earn 101.88 million yuan.

　　"Many of the previous investments were made by others, and this income has to be paid back." Fan Xiuling said. After several years of hard work, Chen Yichao bought eight properties in Beijing, Shanghai, Xiamen and Sanya, including BMW, Mitsubishi and Audi.

　　These properties are now considered by Ganzhou District People’s Procuratorate to be purchased with illegally profited funds. The indictment alleges that in the process of cooperation with the gold company, Chen Yichao repeatedly promised to reward Liu Wenge, the former deputy general manager of the company, after making profits. In May 2007, Liu Wenge offered to buy a car for him, and Chen Yichao paid 307,000 yuan with his personal bank card and bought a Toyota Camry car for Liu Wenge.

　　According to the indictment, Chen Yichao concealed the fact of cooperation with the gold company and obtained the exploration right in the name of the company; Without application, approval, filing or approval, the exploration right was privately invested in the name of the gold company, and then transferred to other companies, which obtained huge illegal benefits and "actually made a profit of 95.17 million yuan".

　　On May 29, 2011, the People’s Procuratorate of Ganzhou District decided to place him under residential surveillance. At first, he was suspected of corruption.

　　Chen Yichao, who is not from party member, has experienced the plot that he only saw on TV. According to the investigation or interrogation record of Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Ganzhou District People’s Procuratorate, he was investigated or interrogated many times in the "case handling point of Jin Peng Building Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection in Lanzhou City". The interrogators and investigators were both Ganzhou District prosecutors and Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection cadres.

　　At the scene of the trial, Chen Yichao repeatedly said that he had been living in the case-handling point of the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection of Jin Peng Building during more than 200 days of residential surveillance. The prosecutor did not deny this.

　　According to the reporter’s field visit on April 10th this year, the Jin Peng Building, which opened in 2004, has 12 floors, and only all the street windows on the fifth floor are surrounded by iron bars. Fan Xiuling said that the fifth floor is the case handling point. The reporter tried to stay on the fifth floor of the building, but the waiter declined on the grounds that the water pipe was broken and there was no hot water.

　　Search, seizure and freezing, Chen Yichao’s property was involved in the storm of criminal cases. On the third day of residential surveillance, the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection temporarily withheld the "cash of 300,000 yuan" involved. A month later, all vehicles under Chen Yichao’s name were temporarily detained.

　　At least 9.52 million yuan has been transferred to the personal account of discipline inspection cadres or prosecutors.

　　There are more and more properties withheld and sealed, and Fan Xiuling didn’t know where the money was stored until November 25, 2011.

　　Fan Xiuling said that the investigators found her and asked her to remit 700,000 yuan from her China bank account with the last number of 1584 to a personal name called Jia Yuan. Jia Yuan is a cadre of Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection contacted by Fan Xiuling. According to public reports, in 2013, Jia Yuan was still attending the meeting of the discipline inspection department in Gansu Province.

　　"I’m not voluntary, I said I don’t turn. The case handler said that this was illegal income. I think the statement is weird, but I don’t understand it specifically. In the end, it’s not up to me. " Fan Xiuling said, "I don’t know about other issues, but I work in a bank and I have to use a court judgment to deduct deposits. I know that."

　　The Application for Remittance in China Bank shows that the purpose of this remittance is "case payment". Another Receipt for Bank Card Withdrawal of Agricultural Bank of China stated that on the same day, Jia Yuan also received a "Kaka Transfer" of 900,000 yuan from Chen Yichao’s bank card.

　　On the same day, the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection recorded in the registration form of temporarily detained and sealed items that "the cash involved in the case handed over by Fan Xiuling was 1.6 million yuan only", which was the sum of the two transfers. The registration form shows that the custodian of this paragraph is Jia Yuan. The reporter found that the custodian of the other six registration forms is also Jia Yuan.

　　On this day, Chen Yichao was released from residential surveillance and changed to bail pending trial, and the alleged crime was also changed to bribery.

　　Chen Yichao and his wife began to investigate where the money was temporarily detained and sealed. They retrieved the bank voucher and found that at least 5 funds and 8.52 million yuan had been transferred to Jia Yuan’s personal account with the ending number of 8717. The opening bank of this account is Lanzhou Jinchang Road Sub-branch of Agricultural Bank of China, and the seal of one receipt shows that the manager is a Ms. Zhu.

　　China Youth Daily reporter came to the business office of the branch on April 11th this year. Many employees said that Ms. Zhu was indeed an employee in the business office and worked on the 5th floor of the building. Official sources confirmed that she was the wife of a cadre of Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection. The cadre participated in the investigation of Chen Yichao’s case, and his name was seen in the transcript many times.

　　Among the aforementioned transfers, the earliest known transfer was RMB 1.803 million on October 19, 2011, which was used as "payable". At that time, Chen Yichao was still monitoring his residence.

　　The name "Sun Wannian" was signed at the signature of the remitter and the blank space of the payee’s information. The reporter found that the contact number left in the "payer" column was also Sun Wannian’s. He was qualified as a senior auditor in 2010. In a public information in March 2012, he was identified as the deputy director of the Audit Bureau of Tianzhu County, Gansu Province.

　　The personal account of the prosecutor also received the money involved. On November 7, 2011, a man surnamed Yan’s account had 1 million yuan remitted to the account of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China named "Chen Guoxun". Four days later, the money was recorded in the registration form of temporarily detained and sealed articles of Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, and the witness was Chen Guoxun.

　　Chen Guoxun is the prosecutor of the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ganzhou District Procuratorate who interrogated Chen Yichao. In April 2014, Chen was appointed as a member of the Procuratorial Committee of Ganzhou District Procuratorate.

　　Li Chengyan, a professor at the School of Government Administration of Peking University, told reporters that no matter what the situation, there are serious problems in transferring the money involved into personal accounts, which are unreasonable, unreasonable and illegal. Zhu Xiaoding, a defense lawyer and lawyer of Beijing Cailiang Law Firm, presented these transfer vouchers during the trial.

　　The prosecutor responded that if there is evidence that the money is remitted to the personal name of the prosecutor and the cadre of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, it can be reported and charged.

　　The prosecutor did not explain whether the money later flowed to a special account. However, she said that when she received the money involved, she had received a check with an amount of 24.7087 million yuan. The defense lawyer asked for verification in court, but the prosecutor did not show it.

　　Three cars, including BMW, were transferred to the General Office of the Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission.

　　Chen Yichao and his wife did not expect that although they walked out of the residence where they lived under surveillance, their three cars were transferred to the General Office of the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection. The three cars are BMW compact car, Pajero compact off-road bus and Audi Q7 compact off-road bus. The license plates are Shanghai FL8996, Beijing EP7763 and Beijing KX0829 respectively.

　　China Youth Daily Zhongqing Online reporter confirmed from official sources that the owners of these three cars were originally Chen Yichao, but they were all changed to "General Office of Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection".

　　In fact, the transfer of vehicle ownership has already begun before the investigation stage is over. In late December 2011, the first car completed the ownership transfer procedure, and the next day, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ganzhou District Procuratorate just formed the Investigation End Report.

　　At the beginning of January 2012, the last car was transferred to the name of the General Office of the Commission for Discipline Inspection. However, two months later, the Zhangye City Procuratorate handed over Chen Yichao’s bribery case to the Ganzhou District Procuratorate for review and prosecution.

　　According to official sources, the registration of each car was transferred from Beijing and Shanghai on the day when the transfer formalities were completed. In the summer of 2012, BMW and Audi cars underwent annual inspection, which means that the new owners may have used the vehicles.

　　In 1998, the Notice of the Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Ministry of Supervision of the CPC Central Committee on Strengthening the Management of Confiscation and Recovery of Illegal Funds and Articles by Discipline Inspection and Supervision Organs stipulated that all confiscated and recovered funds and articles handled by the case-handling offices should be handed over to the financial department of the organ for unified management, and the financial department of the organ should be managed by a special person and set up a special account; Temporary detention and storage of funds and materials should also be properly managed by special personnel; No interception, misappropriation, embezzlement or private sharing is allowed.

　　According to Chen Yichao’s statement in court, the transfer procedures of these three cars were handled by the case handlers with their official seals in Beijing and Shanghai at the end of 2011. The prosecutor did not comment on this.

　　For the reason of "transfer before judgment", some media recently contacted some case handlers of the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, but they were rejected. On the afternoon of April 15, the relevant office phone number of Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection was not answered.

　　Two other cars were also accused of involvement. Lawyer Zhu Xiaoding introduced that the cars were Audi A6L sedan and Toyota Camry sedan, and the license plates were Jing HL4986 and Jing NR1807 respectively. They were transferred to Dong Shaohua and Ma Jian around the end of 2011. The reporter confirmed this statement from official sources.

　　Zhu Xiaoding asked the public prosecutor to issue the identity information of Dong Shaohua and Ma Jian, but the public prosecutor did not produce it. The public prosecutor later said that if there is a problem with the disposal of property, the defender can directly sue.

　　Insiders of Ganzhou District People’s Procuratorate told China Youth Daily that Ma Jian was a section-level procurator of the hospital, while Dong Shaohua was a driver of the hospital, accounting for the establishment of the workers. However, the name of the driver Dong Shaohua appeared in the "Inquirer" column of an inquiry record on September 20, 2011.

　　"How can the property be transferred to the unit or individual?" Professor Li Chengyan is puzzled. Zhu Lijia, a professor at the National School of Administration, said that before the court ruled, the property involved could only be seized and ownership could not be transferred.

　　The reporter noticed that some of the undertakers and custodians of the case overlapped. Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection’s registration forms of temporarily detained and sealed articles on June 10th and 19th, 2011 show that three vehicles were temporarily detained and sealed in these two days, and the investigators were Sun Bing and Bai Zhao Bin, and the custodians were also them. Their names also appear in the "inquirer" or "talker" of several transcripts.

　　If the supervision department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection handles the case by itself, this practice is not allowed. In 2007, "Regulations on the Management of Money and Articles Involved in Self-managed Cases by the Supervision Department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (Trial)" requires that the management of money and articles involved must be legal, fair, accurate and timely, the case undertaker and the custodian should be separated, and the case handling department and the custody department should perform their respective duties.

　　The procuratorate refused to check and identify the money involved on the spot.

　　The problem of property was finally exposed in the prosecution stage.

　　Lawyer Zhu Xiaoding found that in July and September, 2015, Ganzhou District Procuratorate issued two identical indictments, both of which claimed to "recover a Toyota Camry from Liu Wenge". However, in December of that year, this car disappeared from the registration form for the transfer and handling of money and materials involved by the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and the prosecution.

　　In this regard, the public prosecutor explained that Liu Wenge’s case had been finalized in November 2012 and the car had been disposed of. She didn’t issue a handling voucher. In fact, this is the car that was transferred to the name of Dong Shaohua, the driver of the procuratorate in 2011.

　　The aforementioned registration form shows that the money involved in the case was transferred to 24.7087 million yuan, and another 178,900 yuan was turned over to the state treasury. Zhu Xiaoding believes that the case has not yet been decided and there should be no money turned over to the state treasury.

　　In January 2016, the prosecution again issued a change indictment, adding a series of property lists sealed up, detained and frozen by the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, including three cars that have been transferred to the General Office of the Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection.

　　Chen Yichao and his lawyer said that Pajero was purchased in December 2000, which obviously has nothing to do with the bribery case; Another car that was transferred to the name of Ma Jian, a procurator at the official level, is not in the indictment and should be returned.

　　The prosecutor did not respond to this at the trial.

　　The list of withheld money and materials such as vehicles also attracted the attention of defense lawyers. The lawyer said that there are several registration forms and search transcripts of temporarily detained and sealed items on different dates in the file, but there is only one search warrant. The prosecutor admitted that the investigation organ only transferred a search warrant.

　　According to the lawyer, the investigators of many of the aforementioned lists are cadres of the Commission for Discipline Inspection and the witnesses are prosecutors handling cases. According to the judicial interpretation, the case-handling personnel should not be witnesses.

　　Yang Xuelin, a lawyer of Beijing Shouxin Law Firm, pleaded not guilty to Chen Yichao. He believes that Chen Yichao does not have a Beijing hukou, and buying a car is only under the name of Liu Wenge, the former deputy general manager of CITIC Gold Company, not a bribe; Chen Yichao didn’t seek illegal benefits, and Liu Wenge didn’t provide substantial help to Chen before the company was transformed into a private enterprise.

　　The prosecutor insisted that the facts of Chen Yichao’s bribery crime were clear and the evidence was indeed sufficient.

　　In fact, even if he was acquitted, more than four years ago, Chen Yichao’s tens of millions of property had been transferred to the name of the case-handling unit or individual. Legally, these properties were at least once owned by others.

　　On the morning of April 14, Chen Yichao and his defense lawyer proposed to check and identify the money and goods involved, such as the transfer of the temporarily detained vehicle and the vehicle odometer, to determine whether the vehicle has been used after being temporarily detained. They also want to check whether the detained cigarettes and alcohol were originally purchased by Chen Yichao.

　　When the presiding judge asked the public prosecutor for advice, the public prosecutor did not object.

　　Professor Li Chengyan told reporters that many people reported that some corruption control departments, such as customs, made a fortune because of their governance. "Sometimes, it is right to confiscate the money and goods involved, but where the money flows is a new problem. Some are distributed internally, and some even take it for resale. "

　　However, on the morning of April 15, Chen Yichao made his final statement, and the defense lawyer asked the court to arrange to check the money and materials involved, but the prosecutor refused, and the defense lawyer then protested.

　　After a 10-minute recess, the presiding judge relayed the prosecutor’s reply after asking the leaders of the procuratorate: the procuratorate did not agree to show the money and materials involved in the case in court, nor did it agree to arrange for on-site inspection.

　　Newspaper, Zhangye, Gansu, April 15th

CCTV News:According to the website of the Central Meteorological Observatory, yesterday, heavy rainfall continued to occupy Jiangnan, South China and other places, and heavy rains occurred in Quzhou, Zhejiang, Nanping, Fujian, yingtan, Yichun, Ji ‘an, Xiangtan, Hengyang, Loudi, Huaihua, southwestern Guizhou, Baise, Hechi, Liuzhou, Guilin and Dehong, Yunnan. It is estimated that there will still be heavy rainfall in Guangxi, Hunan, Jiangxi, Anhui, Zhejiang and Fujian until 25th, with the strongest rainfall period from 22nd to 24th. Rainfall is constantly superimposed, and the risk of disaster is high, so more attention should be paid to the occurrence of secondary disasters. In the next three days, some areas in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shandong and Henan will see high temperatures every day, and the local maximum temperature can exceed 40 C, which is full of heat. In response to the above weather, the Central Meteorological Bureau has issued a yellow warning for heavy rain and high temperature.

　　At present, the southern region has entered the strongest rainfall period. It is expected that there will be heavy rains in southeastern Guizhou, eastern and northwestern Yunnan, central and northeastern Guangxi, northern Guangdong, southern and eastern Hunan, central and northern Jiangxi, southern Zhejiang, northern Fujian and other places from day to night, among which there will be heavy rains in parts of northeastern Guangxi, central Jiangxi and northwestern Fujian. Some of the above areas have short-term heavy precipitation, accompanied by strong convective weather such as thunderstorms and strong winds. Tomorrow, heavy rainfall will still occur in Guangxi, Hunan, Jiangxi, Zhejiang and Fujian.

　　Meteorologists reminded that during this rainfall process, the heavy rainfall areas are highly overlapped, and the risk of disaster is high. Please pay more attention to the public in Guangxi, Guizhou, Hunan, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Anhui, Fujian, Yunnan and other places, and don’t rush to wade when continuous rainfall or local heavy rainfall may cause flash floods, geological disasters, urban waterlogging, and water accumulation in Lu Yu.

　　In terms of high temperature, yesterday, some areas in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, most of Shandong, northern Henan and other places experienced high temperature of 35 ~ 39℃, and the highest temperature in Changping, Beijing reached 40.4℃, which can be said to be quite hot. It is expected that there will still be continuous high temperature weather in the above areas in the next three days, and the local maximum temperature can exceed 40℃.

　　Among them, during the day, there will be high temperature of 35 ~ 37℃ in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, northern Henan, Shandong, northern Anhui, northern Jiangsu, southern Xinjiang basin and Turpan basin, western and southeastern Inner Mongolia, western Liaoning and other places. Among them, the highest temperature in some areas of southern Xinjiang basin, western Inner Mongolia, central and southern Hebei, Beijing, Tianjin, central and western Shandong, northern Henan and other places is 37 ~ 39.

　　Meteorologists reminded that in many places in the north, it will be hot in the future. Please try to avoid going to outdoor activities and work in the afternoon when the temperature is the highest. When you need to stay outdoors for a long time, please pay attention to replenish water, do a good job of sun protection, and pay attention to body temperature changes to avoid heatstroke or heat stroke.